References for Journalarticle 2012-35

Please note: the authoritative source for references in this article is the according PDF file.

Number of references: 68

Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., and Stein, J.C. (2008). Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3):pp. 617-635. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474389

Amir, R., Evstigneev, I., and Wooders, J. (2003). Noncooperative versus Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Spillover Rates. Games and Economic Behavior, 42(2):183-207. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/gamebe/v42y2003i2p183-207.html

Ang, J.S., and Wu, C. (2011). The Role of Technological Synergy in Mergers and Acquisitions. , . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2024805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2024805

Anton, J.J., and Yao, D.A. (2002). The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights and Contracting. Review of Economic Studies, 69(3):513-31. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/restud/v69y2002i3p513-31.html

Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. NBER Chapters. http://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/2144.html

Arundel, A., and Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the Use of Public Science by Innovative European Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6):559-580. http://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecinnt/v13y2004i6p559-580.html

Bessen, J., and Maskin, E. (2009). Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, 40(4):611-635. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/randje/v40y2009i4p611-635.html

Buehler, B., and Schuett, F. (2012). Certification and Minimum Quality Stanrds Under Imperfect Competition. Mimeo, Tilberg University, .

Buenstorf, G., and Geissler, M. (2009). Not Invented Here: Technology Licensing, Knowledge Transfer and Innovation Based on Public Research. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group, Papers on Economics and Evolution 2009-20. http://ideas.repec.org/p/esi/evopap/2009-20.html

Carranza, J.E. (2010). Product Innovation and Adoption in Market Equilibrium: The Case of Digital Cameras. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(6):604-618. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v28y2010i6p604-618.html

Cassiman, B., and Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R& D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 52(1):68-82. http://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v52y2006i1p68-82.html

Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., and Zuniga, P. (2008). In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4):611-646. http://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v17y2008i4p611-646.html

Cassiman, B., and Valentini, G. (2009). Strategic Organization of R&D: The Choice of Basicness and Openness. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/256308. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/leuven/urnhdl123456789-256308.html

Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., and Zuniga, P. (2010). Diversity of Science Linkages: A Survey of Innovation Performance Effects and Some Evidence from Flemish Firms. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4(2010-33). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-33

Clark, D.J., and Sand, J.Y. (2010). Endogenous Technology Sharing in R&D Intensive Industries. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4(2010-1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-1

Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397):569-96. http://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v99y1989i397p569-96.html

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J.P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers 7552. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/7552.html

De Bondt, R. (1997). Spillovers and Innovative Activities. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/101206. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/leuven/urnhdl123456789-101206.html

Eaton, J., and Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70(5):1741-1779. http://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v70y2002i5p1741-1779.html

Estrada, S., Heijs, J., and Buesa, M. (2006). Innovacion y Comercio Internacional: Una Relacion no Lineal. Informacion Comercial Espanola 830, Los Intangibles de la Internacionalizacion Empresarial. May–June., .

Fabrizio, K.R. (2009). Absorptive Capacity and the Search for Innovation. Research Policy, 38(2):255-267. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v38y2009i2p255-267.html

Fershtman, C., and Gandal, N. (2011). Direct and Indirect Knowledge Spillovers: The “Social Network” of Open-Source Projects. RAND Journal of Economics, 42(1):70-91. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/randje/v42y2011i1p70-91.html

Fleming, L., and Sorensen, O. (2004). Science as a Map in Technological Search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9):909–928.

Freeman, R., and Van Reenen, J. (2009). What if Congress Doubled R&D Spending on the Physical Sciences? In: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 9, pp. 1-38, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. NBER Chapters. http://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/8182.html

Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive Advantages from In-house Scientific Research: The US Pharmaceutical Industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21(5):391-407. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v21y1992i5p391-407.html

Gill, D. (2008). Strategic Disclosure of Intermediate Research Results. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 17(3):733-758. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v17y2008i3p733-758.html

Glachant, M., and Ménière, Y. (2010). Technology Diffusion with Learning Spillovers: Patent versus Free Access. HAL, Post-Print hal-00508795. http://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00508795.html

Goyal, S., Moraga-González, J.L., and Konovalov, A. (2008). Hybrid R&D. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6):1309-1338. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/jeurec/v6y2008i6p1309-1338.html

Gugler, K., and Siebert, R. (2007). Market Power versus Efficiency Effects of Mergers and Research Joint Ventures: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4):645-659. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v89y2007i4p645-659.html

Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., and Scott, J.T. (2003). Universities as Research Partners. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2):485-491. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v85y2003i2p485-491.html

Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., and von Hippel, E. (2003). Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing their Innovations. Research Policy, 32(10):1753-1769. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v32y2003i10p1753-1769.html

Heller, M.A., and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998). Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science, 280(5364):698-701. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/280/5364/698.abstract

Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1):32-59. http://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/randje/v27y1996ispringp32-59.html

Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., and Hamilton, K. (2001). The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the US – A Portrait Based on Patent Analysis. Research Policy, 30(4):681-703. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v30y2001i4p681-703.html

Horowitz, A.W., and Lai, E.L.-C. (1996). Patent Length and the Rate of Innovation. International Economic Review, 37(4):785-801. http://ideas.repec.org/a/ier/iecrev/v37y1996i4p785-801.html

Jost, P.J., and van der Velden, C. (2006). Mergers in Patent Contest Models with Synergies and Spillovers. Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), 58(2):157-179. http://ideas.repec.org/a/sbr/abstra/v58y2006i2p157-179.html

Kamien, M.I., and Zang, I. (2000). Meet me Halfway: Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(7):995-1012. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v18y2000i7p995-1012.html

Katz, M.L., and Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):822-41. http://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/v94y1986i4p822-41.html

Keller, W. (2004). International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3):752-782. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jeclit/v42y2004i3p752-782.html

Leland, H.E. (1979). Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6):1328-46. http://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/v87y1979i6p1328-46.html

Lerner, J., and Tirole, J. (2000). The Simple Economics of Open Source. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers 7600. http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/7600.html

Lerner, J., and Tirole, J. (2004). Efficient Patent Pools. American Economic Review, 94(3):691-711. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v94y2004i3p691-711.html

Lerner, J., Strojwas, M., and Tirole, J. (2007). The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules. University of Toulouse 1 Capitole, Open Access publications from University of Toulouse 1 Capitole http://neeo.univ-tlse1.fr. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/toulou/http–neeo.univ-tlse1.fr-184-.html

Lichtman, D., Baker, S., and Kraus, K. (2000). Strategic Disclosure in the Patent System. University of Chicago Law and Economics Olin Working Paper, 107.

Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic Research and Industrial Innovation. Research Policy, 20(1):1-12. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v20y1991i1p1-12.html

Mazzeo, M.J. (2002). Product Choice and Oligopoly Market Structure. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(2):221-242. http://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/randje/v33y2002isummerp221-242.html

Messinis, G., and Ahmed, A. (2010). Cognitive Skills, Innovation and Technology Diffusion. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Working Paper 48, .

Milliou, C. (2009). Endogenous Protection of R&D Investments. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1):184-205. http://ideas.repec.org/a/cje/issued/v42y2009i1p184-205.html

Moltó, M.J.G., Georgantzís, N., and Orts, V. (2005). Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Technology Differentiation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2):461-476. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v14y2005i2p461-476.html

Monjon, S., and Waelbroeck, P. (2003). Assessing Spillovers from Universities to Firms: Evidence from French Firm-level Data. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9):1255-1270. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v21y2003i9p1255-1270.html

Mussa, Michael, and Rosen, Sherwin (1978). Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18(2):301-317. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jetheo/v18y1978i2p301-317.html

Márquez-Ramos, L., and Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2010). The Effect of Technological Innovation on International Trade. A Nonlinear Approach. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4(2010-11). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-11

Napel, S., and Oldehaver, G. (2011). A dynamic Perspective on Minimum Quality Standards under Cournot Competition. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 39(1):29-49. http://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/regeco/v39y2011i1p29-49.html

O'Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, Suzanne, and Thisse, J.-F. (1998). Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 7(1):1-32. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v7y1998i1p1-32.html

Parvan, S.-V. (2007). Community Innovations Statistics: Weak Link Between Innovative Enterprises and public Research Institutes/Universities. Statistics In Focus : ., 81:1-8.

Poyago-Theotoky, J. (1999). A Note on Endogenous Spillovers in a Non-Tournament R & D Duopoly. Review of Industrial Organization, 15(3):253-262. http://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revind/v15y1999i3p253-262.html

Prokop, J., Regibeau, P., and Rockett, Katharine (2010). Minimum Quality Standards and Novelty Requirements in a One-Shot Development Race. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4(2010-15). http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-15

Ronnen, U. (1991). Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 22(4):490-504. http://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/randje/v22y1991iwinterp490-504.html

Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4):659-79. http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/qjecon/v98y1983i4p659-79.html

Smith, P.J. (2002). Patent Rights and Trade: Analysis of Biological Products, Medicinals and Botanicals, and Pharmaceuticals. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(2):495-512. http://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v84y2002i2p495-512.html

Sobrero, M., and Roberts, E.B. (2001). The Trade-off Between Efficiency and Learning in Interorganizational Relationships for Product Development. Management Science, 47(4):493-511. http://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v47y2001i4p493-511.html

Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science Parks, Knowledge Spillovers, and Firms’ Innovative Performance. Evidence from Finland. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Economics Discussion Paper 2009-32. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2009-32

Stern, S. (2004). Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists? Management Science, 50(6):835-853. http://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v50y2004i6p835-853.html

Suzumura, K. (1992). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in an Oligopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 82(5):1307-20. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v82y1992i5p1307-20.html

Vivekanandan, V. (2008). Transplanting the Bayh-Dole Act: Issues at Stake. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13:480.485.

Wiethaus, L. (2005). Absorptive Capacity and Connectedness: Why Competing Firms also Adopt Identical R&D Approaches. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5-6):467-481. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v23y2005i5-6p467-481.html

Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., and Brewer, M.B. (1998). Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1):290-306. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v88y1998i1p290-306.html

d'Aspremont, C., and Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 78(5):1133-37. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v78y1988i5p1133-37.html