References for Journalarticle 2012-29

Please note: the authoritative source for references in this article is the according PDF file.

Number of references: 48

Bailey, R.A. (1996). Orthogonal partitions in designed experiments. Designs. Codes and Cryptography, 8(1-2):45–77.

Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22(1):23-36.

Breault, K.D. (1983). Psychophysical measurement and the validity of the modern economic approach: A presentation of methods and preliminary experiments. Social Science Research, 12(2):187 - 203.

Camerer, C.F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Cameron, L.A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37(1):47-59.

Deaton, A.S., and Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70(3):312-26.

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., and Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in western and amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320(5880):1217-1220.

Ekman, G. (1964). Is power law a special case of Fechner’s law? Perceptual Motor Skills, 19:730.

Fechner, G.T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Reprinted (1999). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.

Fisher, I. (1892). Mathematical investigations in the theory of value and prices. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers 1965), .

Galanter, E. (1962). The direct measurement of utility and subjective probability. The American Journal of Psychology, 75(2):208-220.

Galanter, E., and Pliner, P. (1974). Cross-modality matching of money against other continua. In: Sensation and Measurement: Papers in honor of S. Stevens, ed. by Moskowitz, H. and Sharf, B. and Stevens, J.C., pp. 65–76., Netherland: Reidel, Netherland.

Galanter, E., Popper, R., and Perera, T. (1977). Annoyance scales for simulated VTOL and CTOL overflights. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8A (Suppl.), 1..

Galanter, E. (1990). Utility functions for nonmonetary events. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(4):449-470.

Gescheider, G.A. (1976). Psychophysics: Methods and theory. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, 61.

Gescheider, G.A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, vol. 435.

Gossen, H.H. (1854). The laws of human relations and the rules of human action derived therefrom. Blitz, R.C. translated. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1983).

Guth, W. (1995). On ultimatum bargaining experiments – A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3):329-344.

Henderson, J.M., and Quant, R.E. (1971). Microeconomic theory: A mathematical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, :6-8.

Hicks, J.R. (1939). Value and capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K.A., and Smith, V.L. (1996). On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. International Journal of Game Theory, 25(3):289-301.

Houthakker, H.S. (1960). Additive preferences. Econometrica, 28(2):244-257.

Intriligator, M. (1980). Economic models, techniques, and applications. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2):263-91.

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297-323.

Klein, L.R., and Rubin, H. (1947). A constant-utility index of the cost of living. The Review of Economic Studies, 15(2):84-87.

List, J., and Cherry, T. (2000). Learning to accept in ultimatum games: Evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers. Experimental Economics, 3(1):11-29.

Lluch, C. (1973). The extended linear expenditure system. European Economic Review, 4(1):21-32.

Luce, R.D., and Edwards, W. (1958). The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. Psychological Review, 65:222–237.

Luce, R.D., and Krumhansl, C.L. (1988). Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, ed. by Atkinson, R. C., Herrstein, R. J., Lindgey, G., & Luce, R. D., pp. 3–73, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.

Luce, R.D. (2010). Interpersonal comparisons of utility for 2 of 3 types of people. Theory and Decision, 68(1):5-24.

MacCrimmon, K.R., and Toda, M. (1969). The experimental determination of indifference curves. Review of Economic Studies, 36(108):433-451.

Masin, S.C., Zudini, V., and Antonelli, M. (2009). Early alternative derivations of Fechner’s law. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences, 45:56-65.

Mosteller, F., and Nogee, P. (1951). An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 59(5):pp. 371-404.

Parker, S., and Schneider, B. (1988). Conjoint scaling of the utility of money using paired comparisons. Social Science Research, 17(3):277 - 286.

Roth, A.E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., and Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 81(5):1068-95.

Rousseas, S.W., and Hart, A.G. (1951). Experimental verification of a composite indifference map. Journal of Political Economy, 59:288.

Siegler, R.S., and Opfer, J.E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3):237–243.

Slonim, R., and Roth, A.E. (1998). Learning in high stakes Ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica, 66(3):569-596.

Starmer, C. (2004). Developments in nonexpected-utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. In: Advances in Behavioral Economics, ed. by Camerer, C.F. and Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M., Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Stevens, S.S. (1959). Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57:201–209.

Stevens, S.S., and Guirao, M. (1963). Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66:177–186.

Stigler, G.J. (1950). The development of utility theory, II. Journal of Political Economy, 58(5):373-396.

Stone, R. (1954). Linear expenditure system: An application to the pattern of British demand. Economics Journal, 64:511–527.

Straub, P.G., and Murnighan, J.K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3):345-364.

Theil, H. (1965). The information approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 33(1):67-87.

Thurstone, L.L. (1931). The indifference function. Journal of Social Psychology, 2:139–167.

Wallis, W.A., and Friedman, M. (1942). The empirical derivation of indifference functions. In: Studies in mathematical economics and econometrics: In memory of Henry Schultz, ed. by Lange, O., McIntire, F., and Yntema, T., pp. 177-183, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago.