References for Journalarticle 2010-9

Please note: the authoritative source for references in this article is the according PDF file.

Number of references: 46

Beckmann, V. (2005). Comment on Soregaroli and Wesseler: Minimum Distance rRquirements and Liability: Implications for Co-Existence. In: Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops, ed. by J. Wesseler, Dordrecht: Springer.

Beckmann, V., Soregaroli, C., and Wesseler, J. (2006). Co-Existence Rules and Regulations in the European Union. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88:1193-1199.

Beckmann, V., and Wesseler, J. (2007). Spatial Dimension of Externalities and the Coase Theorem: Implications for Co-Existence of Transgenic Crops. In: Regional Externalities, ed. by W. Heijman, Dordrecht: Springer.

Boyer, M., and Porrini, D. (2004). Modelling the Choice between Regulations and Liability in Terms of Social Welfare. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37:590-612.

Breustedt, G., Müller-Scheeßel, J., and Latacz-Lohmann, U. (2008). Forecasting the Adoption of GM Oilseed Rape: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(2):237-256.

Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz (2006). Standortregister. Berlin.

Bundesrat (2005). Gesetz zur Neuordnung des Gentechnikrechts. Bundesgesetzblatt 2005: Teil I Nr. 8. Berlin.

Calcott, P., and Hutton, S. (2006). The Choice of a Liability Regime When There is a Regulatory Gatekeeper. Journal of Environmental Management and Economics, 51:153-164.

Commission of the European Communities (2000). Commission Regulation (EC) No 49/2000 of 10 January 2000 Amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1139/98 Concerning the Compulsory Indication on the Labelling of Certain Foodstuffs Produced from Genetically Modified Organisms of Particulars other than... Official Journal of the European Communities, L6/13-14.

Commission of the European Communities (2003). Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on Guidelines for the Development of National Strategies and Best Practices to Ensure the Coexistence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Farming. Official Journal of the European Communities, L189/36-47.

Commission of the European Communities (2005). Questions and Answers on the Regulation of GMOs in the European Union. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biotechnology/gmfood/qanda_en.htm. Update: 24-10-2005. Brussels.

Commission of the European Communities (2006). Annex to the Communication from the Commission Council and the European Parliament. Report on the Implementation of National Measures on the Coexistence of Genetically Modified Crops with Conventional and Organic Farming. COM (2006) 104. Brussels.

Conner, D.S. (2003). Pesticides and Genetic Drift: Alternative Property Rights Scenarios. Choices, (First Quarter):5-7.

Degenhardt, H., Horstmann, F., and Mülleder, N. (2003). Bt-Mais in Deutschland. Erfahrungen mit dem Praxisanbau von 1998-2002. Sonderdruck aus MAIS, 2/2003:1-4.

Demont, M., Wesseler, J., and Tollens, E. (2004). Biodiversity Versus Transgenic Sugar Beet: The One Euro Question. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31:1-18.

Demont, M., Dillen, K., Daems, W., Sausse, C., Tollens, E., and Mathijs, E. (2009). On the Proportionality of EU Spatial Ex Ante Coexistence Regulations. Food Policy, 34(6):508-518.

Desquilbert, M., and Bullock, D.S. (2010). On the Proportionality of EU Spatial Ex Ante Coexistence Regulations: A Comment. Food Policy, forthcoming.

Dixit, A., and Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ewerhart, C., and Schmitz, P. (1998). Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements? Comment. American Economic Review, 88:1027.

Falck Zepeda, J. (2006). Coexistence, Genetically Modified Biotechnologies and Biosafety: Implications for Developing Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88:1200-1208.

GFR (Gentechnikfreie Regionen) (2006). Übersicht: Gentechnikfreie Regionen in Deutschland (Stand: 08.12.2006). Luneburg.

Kershen, D. (2002). Legal Liability Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology. University of Arkansas, School of Law.

Koch, B._(ed.) (2008). Economic Loss Caused by Genetically Modified Organism. Springer Verlag: Wien.

Kolstad, C.D., Ulen, T.S., and Johnson, G.V. (1990). Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Compliments. American Economic Review, 80:888-901.

Landtag Brandenburg (2005). Antwort der Landesregierung auf die kleine Anfrage Nr. 884: Maiszünsler und der Anbau gentechnisch veränderten Mais. Drucksache 4/2309. Potsdam.

Larson, B., and Knudson, M. (1991). Public Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology Field Tests: Economic Implications of Alternative Approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73:1074-1082.

Larson, B. (1996). Environmental Policy Based on Strict Liability: Implications of Uncertainty and Bankruptcy. Land Economics, 72:33-42.

Morel, B., Farrow, S., Wu, F., and Casman, E.A. (2003). Pesticide Resistance, the Precautionary Principle, and the Regulation of Bt Corn: Real Option and Rational Option Approaches to Decision-Making. In: Battling Resistance to Antibiotics and Pesticides, ed. by R. Laxminarayan, Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

Nischwitz, G., Kuhlicke, C., Bodenschatz, T., Thießen, B., and Tittel, K. (2004). Sondierungsstudie gentechnikfreie Regionen in Deutschland. Eine sozioökonomische Analyse am Beispiel der brandenburgischen Uckermark. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftforschung, Büro Hannover.

Roe, B. (2004). Optimal Sharing of Foodborne Illness Prevention between Consumers and Industry: The Effect of Regulation and Liability. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86:359-374.

Scatasta, S., Wesseler, J., and Demont, M. (2006). Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and the Adoption of Transgenic Crops: Experiences from Applications to HT sugar beet, HT corn, and Bt Corn. In: Economics of Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology, ed. by J. Alston, R. Just, and D. Zilberman, Berlin: Springer.

Schmitz, P. (2000). On the Joint Use of Liability and Safety Regulation. International Review of Law and Economics, 20:371-382.

Shavell, S. (1987). Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Shleifer, A. (2010). Efficient Regulation. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 15651.

Smyth, S., Khachatourians, G.G., and Phillips, P.W.B. (2002). Liabilities and Economics of Transgenetic Crops. Nature Biotechnology, 20:537-541.

Smyth, S., and Kershen, D. (2006). Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives. Global Jurist Advances, 6:Article 3.

Soregaroli, C., and Wesseler, J. (2005). Minimum Distance Requirements and Liability: Implications for Co-Existence. In: Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops, ed. by J. Wesseler, Springer, Dordrecht.

Statistische Berichte (2006). Betrieb mit ökologischem Landbau im Land Brandenburg 2005. Potsdam: Landesbetrieb für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik.

Statistische Berichte (2006). Bodennutzung der landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe im Land Brandenburg 2005. Potsdam: Landesbetrieb für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik.

Statistische Berichte (2006). Größenstruktur der Landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe im Land Brandenburg 2005. Potsdam: Landesbetrieb für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik.

Viscusi, W., and Moore, M. (1993). Product Liability, Research and Development, and Innovation. Journal of Political Economy, 101:161-184.

Weaver, R.D., and Wesseler, J. (2004). Monopolistic Pricing Power for Transgenic Crops When Technology Adopters Face Irreversible Benefits and Costs. Applied Economics Letters, 15:969-973.

Wesseler, J. (2003). Resistance Economics of Transgenic Crops. A Real Option Approach. In: Battling Resistance to Antibiotics and Pesticides, ed. by R. Laxminarayan, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

Wesseler, J., Scatasta, S., and Nillesen, E. (2007). The Maximum Incremental Social Tolerable Irreversible Costs (MISTICs) and other Benefits and Costs of Introducing Transgenic Maize in the EU-15. Pedobiologia, 51(3):261-269.

Wesseler, J. (2009). The Santaniello Theorem of Irreversible Benefits. AgBioForum, 12(1):8-13.

Zaid, A., Hughes, H.G., Porceddu, E., and Nicholas, F. (2001). Glossary of Biotechnology for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO.