References for Journalarticle economics

Please note: the authoritative source for references in this article is the according PDF file.

Number of references: 45

Adams, J. (1990). Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4):673-702.

Adams, J.D., Chiang, E.P., and Jensen, J.L. (2000). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER working paper 7612, Cambridge, MA.

Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Kolev, J., Murray, F., and Stern, S. (2009). Of mice and academics: Examining the effect of openness on innovation. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER working paper 14819, Cambridge, MA.

Agrawal, A. (2001). University to industry knowledge transfers: :Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4):285-302.

Alcacer, J., and Gittelman, M. (2006). How do I know what you know? Patent examiners and the generation of patent citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4):774-779.

Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, ed. by Nelson, R.R., Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Arundel, A., and Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6):559-580.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10):1477-1492.

Branstetter, L. (2010). Exploring the link between academic science and industrial innovation. In: Contributions in Memory of Zvi Griliches, ed. by Branstetter, L., National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Cassiman, B., and Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1):68-82. 7.htm

Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., and Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4):611-646.

Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C., and Valentini, G. (2009). Organising R&D projects to profit from innovation: Insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42(2):216 - 233.

Cassiman, B., and Valentini, G. (2009). Strategic organization of R&D: The choice of basicness and openness. Strategic Organization, 7(1):43-73.

Cockburn, I.M., and Henderson, R.M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2):157-182.

Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99(397):569-596.

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., and Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1):1-23.

Darby, M., and Zucker, L. (2001). Change or die: The adoption of biotechnology in the Japanese and U.S. pharmaceutical industries. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 7:85-125.

Darby, M.R., and Zucker, L.G. (2005). Grilichesian breakthroughs: Inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER working paper 9825, Cambridge, MA.

Fabrizio, K.R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2):255 - 267.

Fleming, L., and Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9):909-928.

Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21(5):391-407.

Griliches, Z. (2005). Isues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1):92-116.

Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Market value and patent citations: A first look. University of California, Economics working paper E01-304, Berkeley.

Hall, B.H., Link, A.N., and Scott, J.T. (2003). Universities as research partners. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2):485-491.

Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., and Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3):511-515.

Henderson, R., and Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1):32-59.

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., and Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(1):119-127.

Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., and Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the US – A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30(4):681 - 703.

Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3):577-598.

Jensen, R., and Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1):240-259.

Kim, J., Lee, L.J., and Marschke, G. (2005). The influence of university research on industrial innovation. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER working paper 11447, Cambridge, MA.

Lanjouw, J.O., and Schankerman, M. (1999). The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER working paper 7345, Cambridge, MA.

Liebeskind, J.P., Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L., and Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4):428-443.

Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1):1-12.

Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., and Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3):317-330.

OECD (2001). Science, technology and industry scoreboard: Towards a knowledge-based economy. OECD, Paris.

Parvan, S.-V. (2007). Community innovation statistics: Weak link between innovative enterprises and public research institutes/universities. Statistics in Focus, 81:1-8.

Sobrero, M., and Roberts, E. (2001). The Trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Management Science, 47(4):493-511.

Stern, S. (2004). Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Science, 50(6):835-853.

Thursby, J.G., and Thursby, M.C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1):90-104.

Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1):172-187.

Veugelers, R., and Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5-6):355-379.

Zucker, L.G, Darby, M.R., and Brewer, M.B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1):290-306.

Zucker, L.G., and Darby, M. (2001). Capturing technological opportunity via Japan's star scientists: Evidence from Japanese firms' biotech patents and products. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2):37-58.

Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., and Armstrong, J. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1):138-153.