<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Gilles Saint-Paul</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Welfare Effects of Intellectual Property in a North-South Model of Endogenous Growth with Comparative Advantage</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:description>This paper develops a model for analyzing the costs and benefits of intellectual property
enforcement in LDCs. The North is more productive than the South and is the only source of
innovator. There are two types of goods, and each bloc has a comparative advantage in
producing a specific type of good. If comparative advantage is strong enough, even under
piracy there are goods that the South will not produce. Piracy will then lead to a reallocation
of innovative activity in favor of these goods. That may harm consumers (including consumers
in the South) to the extent that these goods have smaller dynamic learning externalities than
the other goods, and that their share in consumption is small. Thus, whether or not piracy is in
the interest of the South depends on how important are the goods for which it has a comparative
advantage to its consumers, and what the growth potential of these goods is. While, all else
equal, the North tends to lose more (or gain less) from piracy than the South, because monopoly
profits eventually accrue to the North, the South may lose more than the North if there is a
strong enough home bias in favor of the goods for which it has a comparative advantage.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-5</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL F12</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F13</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL O30</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL O34</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

