<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Claude Hillinger</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Measuring Real Value and Inflation</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-06-20</dc:date>
<dc:description>The most important economic measures are monetary. They have many different names, are
derived in different theories and employ different formulas; yet, they all attempt to do the
same thing: to separate a change in nominal value into a &#8216; real part &#8217; due to the
changes in quantities and an inflation due to the changes in prices. Examples are: real
national product and its components, the GNP deflator, the CPI, various measures related to
consumer surplus, as well as the large number of formulas for price and quantity indexes that
have been proposed. The theories that have been developed to derive these measures are
largely unsatisfactory. The axiomatic theory of indexes does not make clear which economic
problem a particular formula can be used to solve. The economic theories are for the most part
based on unrealistic assumptions. For example, the theory of the CPI is usually developed for
a single consumer with homothetic preferences and then applied to a large aggregate of
diverse consumers with non-homothetic preferences. In this paper I review both the general
literature and my own past contributions in order to identify theories of measurement that
are based on plausible economic assumptions. It turns out that all such theories lead to the
Törnqvist price or quantity indexes. The paper also covers several related topics,
particularly the presently unsatisfactory determination of the components of real GDP. I
also propose a novel set of integrated accounts to measure changes in relative prices as well
as the sectoral sources of inflation. Survey and Overview</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-20</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C43</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C82</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL D61</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

