<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Sergio de Nardis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Roberta De Santis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Claudio Vicarelli</dc:creator>
<dc:title>The Single Currency’s Effects on Eurozone Sectoral Trade: Winners and Losers?</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:description>In this paper we study the effect of the single currency across industries for euro area
members. This analysis may help to shed light on the main factors influencing the euro effect
on trade flows. We intend to verify whether these factors are specific to individual sectors
and/or countries or common to the entire euro area. We use a dynamic specification of an
augmented gravity equation. Following the most recent econometric literature, we apply the
&#8220; System GMM &#8221; dynamic panel data estimator of Blundell and Bond to avoid
inconsistency and biases in the estimates, and introduce controls for heterogeneity.
Aggregate sector results average out country-level behaviours that, on their turn, are
affected by different (unobserved) responses of firms, endowed with diverse production
costs, to the enhancing and dampening impacts due to the euro. Due to this reason, the
cancelling out at aggregate level of heterogenous behaviours induces an aggregation bias.
So it is not surprising that when moving from sector to sector/country analysis the picture
becomes much more variegated, with the emergence of a whole range of winners and lossers among
industries in the different nation. Our empirical results are in line with theoretical
framework we assumed as reference that considers the possibility of both stimulative and
dampening effects coming from trade integration and points out the fact that sector exports
impacts are the aggregation results of firm-level heterogenous behaviours.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-17</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C33</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F14</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F15</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F33</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F4</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

