<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Yin-Wong Cheung</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Clement Yuk-Pang Wong</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Are All Measures of International Reserves Created Equal? An Empirical Comparison of International Reserve Ratios</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-05-27</dc:date>
<dc:description>Using available annual data of 174 economies since 1957, we examine the similarities and
differences of seven international reserve ratios. While individual international
reserve ratios display substantial variations across economies, they are associated with
an economy &#8217; s characteristics including geographic location, income level, stage of
development, degree of indebtedness, and exchange rate regime. The association pattern
varies across time and type of international reserve ratios. Interestingly, there is only
limited evidence that Asian and non-Asian economies have significantly different
international reserve hoarding behavior. Our results suggest that the inference about
whether an economy is hoarding too many or too few international reserves depends on the
choice of international reserve ratio. Further, different international reserve ratios
exhibit different persistence profiles, but the evidence of dependence on structural
characteristics is rather weak.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-15</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL F30</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F40</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

