<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Thomas Haertel</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bernd Lucke</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Do News Shocks Drive Business Cycles? Evidence from German Data</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:description>We study the Beaudry and Portier (2006)-hypothesis of delayed-technology diffusion and
news-driven business cycles. For German data on TFP and stock prices we find qualitatively
similar empirical evidence. Quantitatively, however, an impulse response analysis
suggests that a substantial part of the total TFP response is immediate rather than delayed.
We relate this to disembodied technological change and noisy data on TFP. Nevertheless, we
confirm the technology interpretation of structural shocks by showing that they are
Granger-causal for data on patents granted by the German patent agency. We also show that
these shocks generate comovement of macro variables at business cycle horizons and account
for a sizable share of the forecast error variance of these variables in the medium and long
run.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2008-10</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL E32</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

