<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Ray C. Fair</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Evaluating Inflation Targeting Using a Macroeconometric Model</dc:title>
<dc:date>2007-07-11</dc:date>
<dc:description>This paper uses a structurally estimated macroeconometric model, denoted the MC model, to
evaluate inflation targeting in the United States. Various interest rate rules are tried
with differing weights on inflation and output, and various optimal control problems are
solved using differing weights on inflation and output targets. Price-level targeting is
also considered. The results show that 1) there are output costs to inflation targeting,
especially for price shocks, 2) price-level targeting is dominated by inflation targeting,
3) the estimated interest rate rule of the Fed (in Table 4) is consistent with the Fed placing
equal weights on inflation and unemployment in a loss function, 4) the estimated interest
rate rule does a fairly good job at lowering variability, and 5) considerable economic
variability is left after the Fed has done its best. Overall, the results suggest that the Fed
should continue to behave as it has in the past.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2007-8</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL E52</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

