<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Katarina Juselius</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Massimo Franchi</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Taking a DSGE Model to the Data Meaningfully</dc:title>
<dc:date>2007-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:description>    All economists say that they want to take their models to the data. But with incomplete and
    highly imperfect data, doing so is difficult and requires carefully matching the
    assumptions of the model with the statistical properties of the data. The cointegrated
    VAR (CVAR) offers a way of doing so. In this paper we outline a method for translating the
    assumptions underlying a DSGE model into a set of testable assumptions on a cointegrated
    VAR model and illustrate the ideas with the RBC model in Ireland (2004). Accounting for
    unit roots (near unit roots) in the model is shown to provide a powerful robustification
    of the statistical and economic inference about persistent and less persistent
    movements in the data. We propose that all basic assumptions underlying the theory model
    should be formulated as a set of testable hypotheses on the long-run structure of a CVAR
    model, a so called &#8216; theory consistent hypothetical scenario &#8217; . The
    advantage of such a scenario is that it forces us to formulate all testable implications
    of the basic hypotheses underlying a theory model. We demonstrate that most assumptions
    underlying the DSGE model and, hence, the RBC model are rejected when properly tested.
    Leaving the RBC model aside, we then report a structured CVAR analysis that summarizes
    the main features of the data in terms of long-run relations and common stochastic
    trends. We argue that structuring the data in this way offers a number of &#8216;
    sophisticated &#8217; stylized facts that a theory model should replicate in order to
    claim empirical relevance.

    - data in xls file

    

    - program file used in CATS in RATS

    

    - output file in txt format showing the computer output

    

</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2007-4</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C32</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C52</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E32</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

