Discussion Paper

No. 2015-58 | August 31, 2015
Is There Publication Selection Bias in Minimum Wage Research during the Five-year Period from 2010 to 2014?
(Published in Special Issue Meta-Analysis in Theory and Practice)

Abstract

The impact of minimum wages on employment has always been a field of conflicts among economists and this divergence of views has usually taken the form of competing studies. Doucouliagos and Stanley (Publication selection bias in minimum-wage research? A meta-regression analysis, 2009) conducted a meta-analysis of 64 US studies which showed that literature is contaminated by publication selection bias, and once it is corrected, little or no evidence of a negative association between minimum wages and employment remains. This result contradicts the neoclassical theory and gives a Keynesian perspective which suggests that changes in minimum wages are not related with positive or negative employment effects. In their analysis, the authors use a meta-sample of 45 empirical studies published in academic journals in the 2010–2014 five-year period, to investigate whether minimum wage research has been affected by Doucouliagos and Stanley’s study. Their results indicate that there is evidence of publication selection in the elasticities’ meta-sample, but once it is corrected only a small negative effect remains and, in the coefficients’ meta-sample, publication selection bias is not found and the genuine effect is again negative but small. In addition, the authors find that study characteristics related to the data, the model specifications, the minimum wage and employment measure used, and the industry concerned, diversify the sign of the minimum wage effect.

Data Set

JEL Classification:

J38, J21, C12

Assessment

  • Downloads: 1931

Links

Cite As

Georgios Giotis and Michael Chletsos (2015). Is There Publication Selection Bias in Minimum Wage Research during the Five-year Period from 2010 to 2014? Economics Discussion Papers, No 2015-58, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2015-58


Comments and Questions


Anonymous - Referee Report 1
September 07, 2015 - 14:55

see attached file


Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Referee Report 1
October 21, 2015 - 00:01

see attached file


Anonymous - Invited Reader Comment 1
October 05, 2015 - 08:39

see attached file


Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Invited Reader Comment 1
October 26, 2015 - 01:17

Reply to Invited Reader Comment 1


Anonymous - Invited Reader Comment 2
October 05, 2015 - 08:58

see attached file


Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Invited Reader Comment 2
October 26, 2015 - 01:18

Reply to Invited Reader Comment 2


Anonymous - Invited Reader Comment 3
October 19, 2015 - 08:49

see attached file


Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Invited Reader 3
October 26, 2015 - 15:32

Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Invited Reader 3


Anonymous - Referee Report 2
October 22, 2015 - 08:09

see attached file


Giotis and Chletsos - Reply to Referee Report 2
October 26, 2015 - 01:19

Reply to Referee Report 2


Anonymous - Invited Reader Comment 4
November 02, 2015 - 09:02

see attached file