<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Roger Bjørnstad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ragnar Nymoen</dc:creator>
<dc:title>The New Keynesian Phillips Curve Tested on OECD Panel Data</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-02-11</dc:date>
<dc:description>In their work, Galí, Gertler and Lopez-Salido, GGL, assert that the hybrid New Keynesian
Phillips curve (NPC) with dominance of forward-looking behavior and real marginal costs is
robust to choices of estimation procedure, details of variables definitions and choice of
data samples. In an estimation on panel data from OECD countries we replicate the typical
empirical NPC from country studies. However, we also test an alternative economic
interpretation of the empirical correlations. Specifically we find that the expected rate
of future inflation and real marginal costs serve as replacements for equilibrium
correction terms that are implied by the general imperfect competition model of wage and
price setting. As a explanatory model of OECD inflation, the NPC is encompassed by an existing
theory. Paper submitted to the special issue " Using Econometrics for Assessing Economic
Models " edited by Katarina Juselius.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-4</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C23</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C52</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E12</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E31</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

