<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Jens Christopher Andvig</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Corruption and Armed Conflicts: Some Stirring Around in the Governance Soup</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-02-06</dc:date>
<dc:description>The paper discusses the impact of corruption on the probability of violent conflict events
and traces the shifts in the composition of corrupt transactions during and in the aftermath
of violent conflicts in an informal way. So far there has been little interaction between
empirical corruption research and the empirical research into civil wars. When the two
strands of research are brought together and their results are combined, some patterns
become apparent that would have been difficult to detect if the results within each field were
analysed in isolation. Submitted as Survey and Overview</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-3</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL B49</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL O17</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

