<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Aris Spanos</dc:creator>
<dc:title>The ‘Pre-Eminence of Theory’ versus the ‘General-to-Specific’ Cointegrated VAR Perspectives in Macro-Econometric Modeling</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-06-24</dc:date>
<dc:description>The primary aim of the paper is to place current methodological discussions on empirical
modeling contrasting the &#8216; theory first &#8217; versus the &#8216; data first &#8217;
perspectives in the context of a broader methodological framework with a view to
constructively appraise them. In particular, the paper focuses on Colander &#8217; s
argument in his paper &#8220; Economists, Incentives, Judgement and Empirical Work &#8221;
relating to the two different perspectives in Europe and the US that are currently dominating
empirical macro-econometric modeling and delves deeper into their
methodological/philosophical foundations. It is argued that the key to establishing a
constructive dialogue between them is provided by a better understanding of the role of data
in modern statistical inference, and how that relates to the centuries old issue of the
realisticness of economic theories. Paper submitted to the special issue &#8220; Using
Econometrics for Assessing Economic Models &#8221; edited by Katarina Juselius.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-25</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL B4</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C1</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C3</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

