<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Mikael Juselius</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Testing the New Keynesian Model on U.S. and Euro Area Data</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:description>I apply the Johansen and Swensen (1999, 2004) method of testing exact rational expectations
within the cointegrated VAR (Vector Auto-Regressive) model, to testing the New Keynesian
(NK) model. This method permits the testing of rational expectation systems, while allowing
for non-stationary data. The NK-model is tested on quarterly U.S. and Euro area time series
data. I find that the restrictions implied by the core equations of the NK-model are rejected
regardless of sample periods or measures of real marginal costs. I also provide a tentative
explanation of the results favored by previous researches. Paper submitted to the special
issue &#8220; Using Econometrics for Assessing Economic Models &#8221; edited by Katarina
Juselius</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-23</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C32</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL C52</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E31</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E52</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

