<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Niels Framroze MÃ¸ller</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Bridging Economic Theory Models and the Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Model</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-05-09</dc:date>
<dc:description>Examples of simple economic theory models are analyzed as restrictions on the Cointegrated
VAR (CVAR). This establishes a correspondence between basic economic concepts and the
econometric concepts of the CVAR: The economic relations correspond to cointegrating
vectors and exogeneity in the economic model implies the econometric concept of strong
exogeneity for &#946; . The economic equilibrium corresponds to the so-called long-run
value (Johansen 2005), the comparative statics are captured by the long-run impact matrix,
C; and the exogenous variables are the common trends. Also, the adjustment parameters of the
CVAR are shown to be interpretable in terms of expectations formation, market clearing,
nominal rigidities, etc. The general-partial equilibrium distinction is also discussed.
Paper submitted to the special issue &#8220; Using Econometrics for Assessing Economic
Models &#8221; edited by Katarina Juselius.  </dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-21</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C32</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

