<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>José García Solanes</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fernando Torrejón Flores</dc:creator>
<dc:title>The Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in Developed Countries and Emerging Market Economies: Different Outcomes Explained</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-04-08</dc:date>
<dc:description>This paper studies the Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis in two areas with strong differences in
economic development, sixteen OECD countries and sixteen Latin American economies.
Applying panel cointegration and bootstrapping techniques that solve for cross-sectional
dependence problems in the data, we find that the second stage of the hypothesis, which
relates relative sector prices with the real exchange rate, only holds in the Latin American
area. The failure of the latter in the OECD countries as a whole is reflected in departures from
PPP in the tradable sectors, and is probably due to segmentation between national tradable
markets. Paper submitted to the special issue &#8220; Using Econometrics for Assessing
Economic Models &#8221; edited by Katarina Juselius.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-14</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C15</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E31</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F31</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

