<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Julia V. Giese</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Level, Slope, Curvature: Characterising the Yield Curve in a Cointegrated VAR Model</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:description>Empirical evidence on the expectations hypothesis of the term structure is inconclusive and
its validity widely debated. Using a cointegrated VAR model of US treasury yields, this paper
extends a common approach to test the theory. If, as we find, spreads between two yields are
non-stationary, the expectations hypothesis fails. However, we present evidence that
differences between two spreads are stationary. This suggests that the curvature of the
yield curve may be a more meaningful indicator of expected future interest rates than the
slope. Furthermore, we characterise level and slope by deriving the common trends inherent
in the cointegrated VAR, and establish feedback patterns between them and the macroeconomy.
Paper submitted to the special issue " Using Econometrics for Assessing Economic Models "
edited by Katarina Juselius.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-13</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C32</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E43</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E44</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

