Cited By (@RePEc)
 

Discussion Paper

No. 2008-12 | April 07, 2008
Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and Empirical Work

Abstract

This paper asks the question: Why has the "general-to-specific" cointegrated VAR approach as developed in Europe had only limited success in the US as a tool for doing empirical macroeconomics, where what might be called a "theory comes first" approach dominates? The reason this paper highlights is the incompatibility of the European approach with the US focus on the journal publication metric for advancement. Specifically, the European "general-to specific" cointegrated VAR approach requires researcher judgment to be part of the analysis, and the US focus on a journal publication metric discourages such research methods. The US "theory comes first" approach fits much better with the journal publication metric.

Paper submitted to the special issue "Using Econometrics for Assessing Economic Models" edited by Katarina Juselius.

JEL Classification

B4

Cite As

David Colander (2008). Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and Empirical Work. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2008-12, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-12

Assessment



Comments and Questions


Lawrence Boland - Colander's paper
April 17, 2008 - 16:51

see attached


Anonymous - Referee Report
August 11, 2008 - 11:32

See attached file