<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Sergio de Nardis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Roberta De Santis</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Claudio Vicarelli</dc:creator>
<dc:title>The Single Currency’s Effects on Eurozone Sectoral Trade: Winners and Losers?</dc:title>
<dc:date>2008-01-15</dc:date>
<dc:description>In this paper we study the effect of the single currency across industries for euro area
members. This analysis may help to shed light on the main factors influencing the euro effect
on trade flows. We intend to verify whether these factors are specific to individual sectors
and/or countries or common to the entire euro area. We use a dynamic specification of an
augmented gravity equation. Following the most recent econometric literature, we apply a
&#8220; System GMM &#8221; dynamic panel data estimator (Blundell and Bond, 1998) to avoid
inconsistency and biases in the estimates, and introduce controls for heterogeneity. Our
preliminary results indicate some heterogeneity at country level. Despite statistically
pro-trade effects in the majority of the EMU members, at sectoral level there are some
countries in which the impact of the euro has been negative. The pro-trade effects are mainly
concentrated in scale intensive industries. Industrial specialization and location of
these industries, together with other factors (i.e. differences in factor endowments,
product regulations across countries), may have determined &#8220; the winners and the
losers &#8221; in the monetary integration process. These preliminary findings are in line
with those of the few other studies on this issue. In particular, this recent literature seems
consistent with Baldwin &#8217; s (2006) &#8220; new good &#8221; hypothesis. However, in
our estimates the magnitude of these effects are lower, probably because of our empirical
strategy. Moreover, the sector/country analysis points out that other specific factors
have been in place in shaping differently the euro effect on trade.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2008-1</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C33</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F14</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F15</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F33</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL F4</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

