<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Masanao Aoki</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hiroshi Yoshikawa</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Non-Self-Averaging in Macroeconomic Models: A Criticism of Modern Micro-founded Macroeconomics</dc:title>
<dc:date>2007-11-26</dc:date>
<dc:description>Using a simple stochastic growth model, this paper demonstrates that the coefficient of
variation of aggregate output or GDP does not necessarily go to zero even if the number of
sectors or economic agents goes to infinity. This phenomenon known as non-self-averaging
implies that even if the number of economic agents is large, dispersion can remain
significant, and, therefore, that we can not legitimately focus on the means of aggregate
variables. It, in turn, means that the standard microeconomic foundations based on the
representative agent has little value for they are expected to provide us with accurate
dynamics of the means of aggregate variables. The paper also shows that non-self-averaging
emerges in some representative urn models. It suggests that non-self-averaging is not
pathological but quite generic. Thus, contrary to the main stream view, micro-founded
macroeconomics such as a dynamic general equilibrium model does not provide solid micro
foundations.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2007-49</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL C02</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E10</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E32</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL O40</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

