<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Ilian Mihov</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Andrew K. Rose</dc:creator>
<dc:title>Is Old Money Better than New? Duration and Monetary Regimes</dc:title>
<dc:date>2007-07-09</dc:date>
<dc:description>We compare the duration and performance of different monetary regimes, especially the
contrast between countries those that fix exchange rates and those that target inflation.
Inflation targeting is a more durable policy; no country has yet been forced to abandon an
inflation target, while many have abandoned fixed exchange rates. Indeed, even though
inflation targeting began only in 1990, the duration of inflation targeting regimes is at
least as long as, or longer than all alternative monetary regimes for comparable countries.
Regime duration also matters in monetary policy; older regimes are typically more
successful than younger ones in achieving low inflation.   Paper submitted to the special
issue " Recent Developments in International Money and Finance " edited by Ronald MacDonald</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2007-25</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL E52</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL E58</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

