<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' 
         xmlns:rdfs='http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#' 
         xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' 
         xmlns:dcterms='http://purl.org/dc/terms/'>

<rdf:Description>

<!-- static entries -->

    <dc:publisher>Economics: The Open-Access, Open Assessment E-Journal</dc:publisher>
    <dc:publisher>http://www.economics-ejournal.org</dc:publisher>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

<!-- generated entries --> 

<dc:creator>Philip E. Graves</dc:creator>
<dc:title>A Simple Coase-Like Mechanism that Transfers Control of Government Spending Levels from Politicians to Voters</dc:title>
<dc:date>2007-03-23</dc:date>
<dc:description>Elected representatives have little incentive to pursue the interests of those electing
them once they are elected. This well-known principle-agent problem leads, in a variety of
theories of government, to non-optimally large levels of government expenditure. An
implication is that budgetary rules are seen as necessary to constrain politicians &#8217;
tax and spending behavior. Popular among such constraints are various Balanced Budget
Amendment proposals. These approaches, however, are shown here to have serious
limitations, including failure to address the central concern of spending level. An
alternative approach is advanced here that relies on a Coase-like mechanism that transfers
control of government spending to the voter. Prisoner's dilemma incentives and political
competition are seen to be critical to the superiority of the present mechanism to approaches
requiring budget balance.</dc:description>
<dc:identifier>http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2007-12</dc:identifier>
<dc:subject>JEL H11</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL H61</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL H62</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>JEL H72</dc:subject>


</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

